Augenblick – a blink of the eye

Information we can see

Event horizon

The boundary beyond which events cannot affect an observer.


A context in which a small change can cause a large effect in dynamical and social systems.

Quantum fractals

Electrons with fractional dimension have been observed in an artificial Sierpiński triangle,
demonstrating their quantum fractal nature

The beauty of a thought.


The study of the intrinsic spin
of the electron
and its associated magnetic moment,
in addition to its fundamental electronic charge,
in solid-state devices.

Gosset polytope

8-dimensional information projected to 3-D.

Jitterbugging vector equilibrium

Holographic reality

Poincare’ ball model

hyperbolic regular icosahedral honeycomb, {3,5,3}

Spherical triangulation
E8 vertex model

8-dimensions projected to 2-D

previous arrow
next arrow

The "event horizont" and maximum information of an "Augenblick"

  • Decision making and problem solving capabilites depend on the amount of information we can see. Unfortunately, total information consists of visible and invisible parts. This is due to human optical limitations of visible wavelengths as well as the “Heisenberg uncertainty principle“.  
  • Pseudomorph makes all possible information visible and relates it with each other, whether we can see it or not. This maximum amount of information is the “Grand Canonical Ensemble” and models the “perfect reality construct-spacetime slice” that can be consciously observed or measured. 
  • The maximum amount of accessible information depends on our level of consiousness. The more consious we are, the more we can see. Our consciousness level is impacted by two factors: 1) amount of wisdom about one’s own identity (Module 0); 2) amount of stress in a situation (Module 5). Both factors create gravity that can distort or improve the information available (cognitive bias), and hence either create performance or pathology


  1. Pseudomorph illustrates the psychophysical relationship between decision-making, identity, space and time.
  2. The conceptual spaces were related to the 120 icosians. They can be broken down to the 117 SIC-POVMs of the Kochen Specker Theorem as the minimum pure consciousness states, and the 3D coordinate axes for best decision making. The E8 lattice has in addition the 120 „Not“ categories.
  3. The transition phases can be explained with the Potts model. Transformations from information to energy and matter relate to gasenous, liquid and solid states in spinglas systems and superconductivity.
  4. The purpose of the human identity is learning, growth and transformation or simply information processing. If there is too much or too little information flow in reality constructs, caused by pressure (turbulences/dihedral effect)) or temperature (gaps and contradictions) pathologies or anomalies emerge. Gaps and contradictions in reality constructs distort information flow to the point of psychopathologies.
  5. The level of consciousness can be measured by adding and multiplying observable concepts. Triangulation on the SIC‘s can be used to ask better questions or to make invisible observables visible. The higher the level of consciousness, the more sustainable a solution is. Sustainable Happiness is therefore the single best KPI for effective problem solving.

The hard problem of consciousness: Why? What‘s the purpose?

Consciousness defines the relationship between identity, performance and pathology. It is the built in coordinate system, the core wisdom, the root cause of the finite and infinite reference frame for orientation and navigation in hyperspace.
Especially, for the fine tuning of the conceptual spaces in decision making and problem solving processes.

The „tipping point“ in human development is the moment when we take „responsibility“ for the conscious experience of being  and becoming human on this planet.

Responsibility means, that we are not only responsible for what „we do“, but also for what we „don‘t do“, but could have done.

Flight through hyperspace


  1. The Pseudomorph model itself presents no new scientific information.
  2. The novelty lies only in the dressing of the reality construct with a psychosocial topological skin to design a „cognitive map“, so measurements can be performed more effectively – without the measurement error.
  3. Although the labels match nicely the theories behind, a structured semantical analysis on the categories used in the model would need to be performed, to show whether they are actually from the same frameworks or perhaps slightly off and better labels should be used to model a natural language more precicely.